China’s zero tariff regime has the potential to boost trade between African countries and lead to better coordination.
The Supreme Court ruled Friday that President Trump overstepped his authority in ordering tariffs on nearly everything the U.S. imports. Here's some economic context to understand that decision.
The U.S. can imposed tariffs for a number of legal reasons that are being explored and cited by the administration of Donald Trump. With help from a top international trade lawyer, here is a brief ...
Trump tariffs 2025 impact Americans: A Federal Reserve Bank of New York study challenges claims that foreign countries bore the cost of President Trump's 2025 tariffs. The report found that American ...
Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. Justice Brett Kavanaugh called the Supreme Court’s decision striking down Trump’s emergency tariffs "illogical" in a fiery dissent ...
The suit claims that Trump is once again trying 'to usurp the taxing power that the Constitution vests in Congress.' ...
To read this article with full citations, please visit taxnotes.com. Politicians talk a lot about tariffs, and much of what they say boils down to a simple question: Who pays? President Trump has ...
Tariffs can play multiple roles: they have traditionally been used as instruments of trade policy, and the Trump administration has increasingly employed them as foreign policy tools to extract ...
Peter E. Harrell & Jennifer Hillman (Lawfare) had an interesting post yesterday, "Unexpected Questions in Learning Resources v. Trump," with the subtitle "Are IEEPA tariffs permitted as either a ...
Justice Brett Kavanaugh called the Supreme Court’s decision striking down Trump’s emergency tariffs "illogical" in a fiery dissent on Friday and offered a roadmap of alternatives for Trump to attempt ...
Justice Brett Kavanaugh called the Supreme Court’s decision striking down Trump’s emergency tariffs "illogical" in a fiery dissent on Friday and offered a roadmap of alternatives Trump could use to ...